Today’s Yakima Herald reports that Sonia Rodriguez will introduce a binding code of ethics at the next council meeting July 7th. Bravo!! This is timely and sorely needed. Besides the recent Open meetings Act fiasco that Rick Ensey, Kathy Coffey, Bill Lover and Micah Cawley recently orchestrated, the newspaper points out a model ethics code would expressly bar council members from disclosing information from closed council sessions. Sonia foresees an ethics committee to censure or punish violators. Great stuff. And a very important issue.
We all know that there are several council members that are real tight with Bruce Smith, editor of the Yakima Business Times. (Bill Lover, Kathy Coffee, Rick Ensey for certain). These council members all have pretty low ethics standards. Their close association with B.S. brings into question how much information from executive session that they pass on to the puppet master. Here’s an example:
About 2 or 3 years ago (when I was still on the council) we went into executive session to discuss the city manager’s performance review. Some real sensitive stuff was kicked around at this meeting and Bill Lover reported it all to Bruce Smith at one of their coffee shop meetings. Smith then published an editorial about the executive session discussions without naming Lover as his source. Lover later admitted he had made the disclosures to B.S. and he was kind of irked by the fact that his pal Bruce would actually write a story about the confidential information.
This would be a clear violation of an ethics code that Sonia is proposing. Had we had that then, perhaps we could have censured Lover and maybe diminished Bruce Smith’s entanglement with the City Council. The fact remains that Bruce Smith’s presence is lurking in every executive session the council has. As long as B.S. maintains his influence and his access to even one council member, the council will never restore trust with the public.
Blogroll
Archives
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Adhering to a Code of Ethics would seem like an obvious choice to most, yet clearly antithetical to folks like Ensey, Lover, Coffey and Cawley. Bet Bruce Smith is hoping this code of ethics thing doesn’t take hold- it might interfere with his control over these council members.
As for Bill Lover, after he spilled to Smith, and Smith printed what he did, you’d think the Lover would wise up and cut his ties to this guy. Since he still chooses to follow Smith’s marching orders, it underscores how important it is to remove Bill Lover from the council, as well as any other council members who are “working” for Smith.
Clearly Sonia Rodriguez knows who she’s working for, and council members like her need to be kept around.
Clearly Drew needs to keep his nose out of Yakima business as he is just a sometimes visitor to Yakima.
Yes, don’t get involved in Yakima business, we saw that on the Dukes of Hazard, ya know?