Click here for the 36 page brief filed with the court for the Friday, August 25th hearing. This brief is on behalf of the plaintiffs, Charlotte Jones and Gene Rupel. I will try and get Ensey’s brief and post it also. These are public documents and provide interesting reading to anyone interested in this case. You can be the judge!
Blogroll
Archives
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Thanks for posting this – look forward to the Ensey response
I can’t believe I read the whole thing!
It is quite clear now why the co-conspiritors voted to provide a blank check for Ensey’s legal fees – they all rolled around in the same pile of er, mud. Disgusting, and to think that some of them are shameless enough to run for re-election and that some of our fellow citizens will actually vote for these persons of questionable character and ethical lapses. I resent my tax money being used to support this sneaky approach to disregard the law and manipulate the system.
Well, you didn’t have to wait long, seagal. Looks like this crap is a non-starter….whose paying Ron’s legal fees????
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Ron’s legal fees for what? Or is that another one of your con distractions from the issue?
He’s not appealing to the Supreme Court? WHEW…….
And Drew..the issue is..HE LOST. No distraction there.
Get used to it, pal.
Umm, neal, this was not filed by Ron. I know, court filings do not have pictures attached, but you’re going to have to learn to read these things without the image reference. Everybody else can, and we think you can too.
Ron’s toadys filed on Ron’s behalf..don’t be so stupid…
This message approved by Barack Hussein al-O’bama (he’s part Irish too)
Neal, you are quick to insult people you don’t even know. The petitioners are finer people that you could ever hope to be. I appreciated their effort to get the issue before the voters. Too bad the email evidence was not a bit stronger in implicating Lover and Cawley since the rolling quorum was evidenced by the budget committee vote. You will never convince me the whole thing was not orchestrated and implemented by Bruce Smith. Now we have to put up with another two years of Ensey’s insolence – yuk!
As you don’t know me either, Seagal, not sure how you can say such an insult….
What exactly have these people done for Yakima to make it a better place?
I want specific examples…not just political rhetoric.
And while your at it, what have YOU done to enrich the lives of people in Yakima?
“You’re”
How could I make such a grammatical faux pas?
Neal,
These insulting one liner you have about President Obama are very childish, but what should we expect from you?
Maybe you should start looking at your family tree? Then we could come up with a one liner about you too.
Maybe something like:
This message is approved by I act like a two year old NEAL…