Faux News

Fox news has credibility from the view of the variant thinker. Since it’s inception, Fox has, with great vigor, built a corral in which it corners the outcast, dis-enfranchised, lost and very independent lover of freedom. Nothing wrong with being a lover of freedom, and essentially nothing wrong with being dissatisfied. What is wrong is the queasy appeal  to violence and the notion that weirdness is the answer to your vexations about what is happening to govern our lives. One has to be careful about mixing motives, but Tea people and Republicans have both been combative in the face of  strategems to improve what seems not up to scratch.

A disproportionate opposition to proposals for improvement is the sign of  pugnacity, when a more cooperative stance could have led to new requirement more fitting to the repair. To expect massive change of government is just not in the reach of current political milieu. To expect that gradual change will bring more gradual change is more in line with reality expectations. What disappoints thoroughly is the jejune and foolish attitude that pushiness coupled with disdain for partnership and synergy will arrive at acceptable levels of change.

We should all be convinced, by now, that gridlock only generates added gridlock and frustration. It also forces the image that  some greymatter is not, or may not reach, full development. Merely producing the opposite does not mean that you have found an answer. It’s a pretty easy  to always seeks the opposition, rather than attempting to ferret out an answer from the possibilities.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Faux News

  1. corie says:

    I wish they would stop calling themselves a news organization,, :roll:

  2. mainstreeter says:

    The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which “people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices but their incompetence robs them of the meta cognitive ability to realize it.”[1] The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their own ability as above average, much higher than in actuality; by contrast, the highly skilled underrate their abilities, suffering from illusory inferiority. This leads to a perverse result where less competent people will rate their own ability higher than more competent people